New online disk rules prohibit sharing unauthorized works
net disk, if you want to achieve the storage function, if you want to continue the sharing function, you may encounter the risk of law. In my opinion, if the online disk wants to avoid this risk, there are only two solutions: one is to cut the business of personal storage, and the other is to buy a lot of copyright.
on October 21, the National copyright Administration formally announced the notice on standardizing the copyright order of online disk Services. The notice points out that online disk service providers shall, in a prominent position on their home page, remind users to abide by the copyright law, respect the legitimate rights and interests of copyright owners, and not illegally upload, store and share other people's works. The mode of notification and complaint of the obligee shall be marked in detail on the front page of the online disk, and the notification and complaint of the obligee shall be accepted in a timely manner, and the relevant infringing works shall be removed within 24 hours after receiving the notice or complaint of the obligee, delete or disconnect the links to the relevant infringing works.for quite a long time before that, the old way of sharing used by some online disks was very popular, and the so-called old way of sharing was public sharing. However, with the introduction of the notice, it is clear that the online disk can no longer share works with unclear copyright as casually as before. In fact, the previous net is already suppressing this kind of sharing. It's just, it's more clear now. In addition, online disk operators must deal with those works whose copyright is not clear in time after receiving complaints.
the pressure of online disk is increasing, and I feel that online disk will hardly have any chance in the old way of sharing.
the notice points out that "Internet disk service providers shall not upload unauthorized works of others without authorization or organize uploading, recommending, ranking, and other processing of works uploaded or stored by users. Users shall not guide, induce or encourage users to illegally share other people's works in various ways, or provide convenience for users to illegally share other people's works by using other forms of network services." This is very straightforward to tell the network disk, do not have any illusions.
Network disk, if you want to achieve the storage function, if you want to continue the sharing function, you may encounter the risk of law. In my opinion, if the online disk wants to avoid this risk, there are only two solutions: one is to cut the business of personal storage, and the other is to buy a lot of copyright.
if you cut off the storage business, you have to transform; if you buy copyright, you have to increase the cost. In this way, if the online disk wants to survive, it needs to be transformed into a video website storage provider, or cooperate with video websites to purchase copyright works for users to store and download. Otherwise, apart from some works that are marked to be shared by the public, which works will be allowed to be downloaded and shared for free?
the new rules of the network disk will completely kill the old-style sharing and sharing. Before
, our idea was that the Internet needs to share, needs to share. But the reality is that copyright owners also have to eat, and if everyone wants to share for free, then copyright owners will starve to death. The traditional music industry is almost killed by free sharing on the Internet, and that's the lesson before. As a result, there is a contradiction, is it to solve our sharing needs, or to protect the food needs of copyright owners? The law, as an arbitrator, must choose a position to "stand by", and it is impossible to choose avoidance or neutrality. Therefore, even those of us who support sharing will understand that the law should protect copyright. And the old-fashioned sharing, the idea of free meals, must pay a price.
the new rule of online disk is the result of the law standing between the spirit of sharing and copyright protection, which has no choice.
and those online disk operators, in addition to those who have transformed into enterprise clouds, except those who have rich copyright resources, and those who have copyright resources in the alliance, if they are still obsessed with old-style network sharing, then the future is bound to be bad.
it's just that, after suffering those hand-holding parties who are active in the online disk, how will they live in the future? In fact, I feel that the real sharing should be based on the protection of copyright holders under the premise of sharing, free should also have a price. Before, we may have put too much emphasis on ourselves.
maybe there will be a new kind of sharing in the future, but that must be sharing under the premise of protecting copyright holders. But today, the law must choose between the old spirit of sharing and copyright protection. As for the personal storage part of network storage, we must figure out a more suitable and secure way to meet people's sharing needs. Alternatively, the storage operator pays for the user, or the sharing initiator pays for the sharing partner. And the law, it seems, should also find a way to deal with the sharing needs. Otherwise, we have no choice but cinemas, DVD and video sites?
the old share is dead, the new share hasn't been born yet, we just have to wait.
Edit: yvonne