and it is precisely because these directors have obtained positive market feedback that they can promote censorship as if the thick Songhua River ice is slowly melting in the spring, isn't it a good thing to take a turn for the better?
the National Day holiday has come to an end, and the four immortal beasts in the National Day stalls have all been marked as "seen". To sum up, what blinds the audience's titanium eyes most is not the white eyes of Guo Caijie in "the trail of Glory" or the ghost smiles of Yue Yue in "passing through your world". But the yardstick of "Operation Mekong"-Peng Yuyan, as an undercover anti-drug policeman, killed the drug dealer in order to take revenge, although it was not a front shot, but it was shocking enough.
filmmakers should have a thump in their hearts when they see it, and censorship can be done this way?
Operation Mekong can be filmed. With the support of the Ministry of Public Security and the need to promote our national prestige, it seems understandable that such a large scale has emerged. In order to overexamine all sensitive plots, director Lin Chaoxian should not only work hard on the script and design the plot reasonably and positively, but also take the trouble to fully communicate with all censors, including the General Administration of Optoelectronics and the Ministry of Public Security. let them understand all their intentions. this makes Lin Chaoxian look like a super forward. It's amazing to make a long-distance run and dribble breakthrough alone. However, it is too easy to understand this. From the perspective of the censors, looking back on the experiences of many films over the years, we will find that they are not as stubborn as people think. Instead, they are deliberately "releasing water" step by step. comments received by this is only the preface to the censorship opinions received by the films. After that, 15 films are different from the screenplay, and five films are not revised in accordance with the screenplay censorship opinions. I feel that I can almost see the full picture of the censorship regulations at that time, and I can also feel the black question mark on Jiang Wen's face when he saw the censorship opinions. two years later, "the Devils are coming" premiered at the Cannes Film Festival. Another two years later, it was released in Japan. So far, it has not been shown in China. for a long time after that, there was always negative news about the confrontation between the director and the censorship department. What film was banned and which director was disqualified. When the news that the so-and-so director attacked the censorship system appeared, the emotion of the audience must also turn to the director. in 2012, Lou Ye, the "old rival" of the censors, suddenly began to post the opinions of the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Radio, Film and Television (Film Office) on the movie "the floating City Myth" on Weibo. This is the modification opinion received again after the "floating City Mystic" got the dragon label. The reason why this strange process was touched could not be verified because of the information asymmetry, but the influence of this matter was simply blown apart in the circle at that time. you can see between the lines that Lou Ye is angry. However, finally decided to enter the mainstream, finally got the dragon mark, Lou Ye but the most do not want the "floating city riddle" to be banned, so angry into communication, passive into initiative. in fact, compared with the paper-like censorship opinions received by "the Devils are coming", Lou Ye received the censorship opinions of this edition is very simple, just two things: one is to cancel the match, the other is to delete the sex scenes and cut the violence scenes. Lou Ye almost agreed, with the exception of "deleting Qiao Yongzhao's shot of killing trash pickers with a hammer (the number of smashes is retained twice)." To this end, after several rounds of communication with the censors during the 18 days from September 7 to September 25, Lou Ye finally reached an agreement after a face-to-face discussion with the leaders of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television on the revised plan: a 3.23 frame fade out (darkening) under the last 3 of Qiao Yongzhao's 13 hits on the scavengers, and no other changes were made. Lou Ye's open style of dialogue makes the struggle look like an adventure, but it also gives everyone a lot of inspiration: although under the pressure of public opinion, SARFT leaders are willing to talk face-to-face with the creators after all. The result also sends a lot of positive messages: communication is more effective than boycott. In short, SARFT has changed and is not as inhumane as it used to be. shooting police and bandit films in the mainland, there are already many restrictions, and then run into Johnnie to, who is famous for shooting triads. What can I do? Many people in the circle know that "War on drugs" has won the support of the anti-drug department because of a certain side, and Johnnie to is no longer passively "handing over" the end, but taking the initiative to "clash" with censorship. Johnnie to has revealed that after the film has been filmed, the relevant departments have only put forward two amendments: first, do not have too many gun battles and do not kill too many police officers; second, the scenes of police drug abuse can be filmed, but less (Sun Honglei plays the captain of the anti-drug brigade, forced to take drugs in order to blend into gangs and gain trust). These two opinions are very general. But in the end, we were surprised to see: first, there were a lot of gunfights and firepower, and the police sacrificed a lot in the last war, and of course the drug dealers were all killed by the police. Second, the scene of Sun Honglei taking drugs is too specific and real. how do you spend it? According to the logical thinking of the censorship department revealed by Lin Chaoxian, apart from the fact that this scene can show the dangers and entanglements faced by the anti-drug police, the later scene of Sun Honglei's detoxification with drinking water and soaking in ice water also played a key role-the method of detoxification was revealed to the police by a drug dealer played by Gu Tianle. How positive it is. In addition, "War on drugs" is the first time allowed to show the scene of lethal injection. Although Koo Tien-Lok has only one side face, if there is no test of the play, there will be no "scorching sun" behind it. the most difficult subject matter for police and bandits has taken a turn for the better. There is no doubt that the active initiative of the public security department itself has played an important role. 
sure enough, the scorching sun caused a sensation in Shanghai in June 2015. The excitement seen by the audience was that Deng Chao, Duan Yihong and Guo Tao got the "three yellow eggs" actor! But what the filmmakers see in their eyes is that the gay plot can be expressed! The police can swear! The frontal lens of lethal injection appears!
although the criminal played by Deng Chao in the film is only to clear the suspicion of pretending to be homosexual, the scale is astonishing. But being able to appear shows that the logical thinking of the censorship department is no longer an one-size-fits-all approach, but takes into account the functionality of the plot. the police can swear. I am so moved that people have the right to swear. Although the subtitles are shy and timid, they are still highly praised and do not explain! and the front scene of lethal injection at the end of the film seems painful and cruel, but from the feedback of the audience, for the popularization of the legal concept-crime has to bear the consequences, it can be said to get twice the result with half the effort. This kind of shock and deterrence is incomparable to the scene of the police arresting criminals in any previous police and gangster film. recall the censorship opinions received by director Cao Baoping-"Glorious anger" (2007): how can we make the party's grass-roots cadres so lewd? Li Mi's conjecture (2008) "how can you write a story about a girl falling in love with a drug dealer?" -- has a substantial change taken place? what is interesting is that perhaps this shift is too substantial to accept. Search for "Why can the scorching Sun be approved by SARFT?" There is such an answer from an anonymous user. although there is no way to verify whether the authenticity was indeed written by an anonymous person, the same sentence shows the change in the logic of thinking of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television and the public security department, which is the protagonist of such films. in the following two years, "Save my husband", "Thriller 2" and "Operation Mekong" were released one after another, in which "Save my husband" and "Operation Mekong" were adapted from real and important cases, while "Equator" and "Thriller 2" involved high-level image and political situation. ("Operation Mekong" has been fully revealed, please follow Tencent Entertainment's "Director Park Director Lin Chaoxian" tomorrow.) some screenwriters even came out and said that "the scorching Sun" has also helped a lot. < strong > the screenwriter reveals that the screenwriter < / strong > in the face of censorship < / strong > < strong > the screenwriter reveals that he / she is facing censorship
. but there is no doubt that in addition to the efforts made by filmmakers, the relevant departments have also strongly felt the strong demand for this kind of theme in the marketization of Chinese films. this substantial shift in logical thinking is not only reflected in crime films about police and bandits. 
or 2014, director Peter Chan's" Dear ", in which Zhang was asked to show the death certificate of a child who was still abducted when he went to apply for a birth permit, and after several rounds, he asked civil servants to insist on acting according to the rules. This is simply a big taboo of the Family Planning Office, and it is inevitable for all people in the circle to see the scene for the first time. Chen Kexin was also worried that there would be something wrong with the scene, but he finally tried his best to keep it. His reason is that the absurdity of the play and Zhang's sense of despair do not come from the attitude of civil servants, but from the whole incident itself. As a result, the Family Planning Office understood and accepted this setting. It's so positive, isn't it?!
it seems that the lack of specific standard censorship rules makes the solution to the review of a film full of uncertainty. in many cases, the verbal skills and even luck of the director and the film side become the decisive factor, which is really frustrating. but from another perspective, censorship has once become a fig leaf for a large number of bad film directors, but a few awesome directors such as Johnnie to, Cao Baoping, and Lin Chao-hsien can still produce works that are full of appreciation without losing expression. And it is precisely because these directors have obtained positive market feedback that they can promote censorship just as the heavy Songhua River ice is slowly melted in the spring. Isn't it a good thing to take a turn for the better?
Edit: yvonne
白羊座
金牛座
双子座
巨蟹座
狮子座
处女座
天秤座
天蝎座
射手座
摩羯座
水瓶座
双鱼座
